What are the biggest problems in IoT? Where do current market IoT solutions fall short? How should IoT be considered?
Put another way, “What are the most common issues preventing companies from fully realizing the benefits of IoT?” This question was answered at DZone by 23 executives involved with the Internet of Things.
The IoT industry, across numerous market verticals, is at an impasse where customers are demanding increasing sophistication at lower prices. Given the complexity and importance of IoT, no single company can or should be dictating the path forward for the entire industry.
The only viable path forward is collaboration between companies and market verticals to collaborate on developing, testing and standardizing the non-differentiating functionality. The Open Connectivity Foundation is currently working to achieve that, however the device-hub communication represents a unique challenge for the engineers involved because there has never been a historical need for engineers to become knowledgeable in both embedded systems and cloud-native application development. The proposed solution to this problem is to emulate the container runtime interface (CRI) architecture and embody Conway’s law to establish a loose coupling between the “IoT code” (CoAP / IoTivity) and the portions of the system that are much more familiar to the cloud developers (ex: db/messaging/auth) which will also vary more depending on the use case.
plgd makes it simpler to build a successful IoT initiative – to create a proof of concept, evaluate, optimize, and scale.